Allen v. Cain et al
| Derrick Jerome Allen |
| N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr. |
| 3:2011cv00211 |
| March 30, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Frank J. Polozola |
| Stephen C. Riedlinger |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
RULING and ORDER OF DISMISSAL Adopting 46 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The Petition Under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody filed by Derrick Jerome Allen is denied and this matter is hereby dismissed. Signed by District Judge Shelly D. Dick on 8/20/2013. (SMG)
|
|
Filing
27
RULING denying 24 Motion to Compel and 26 Motion for Contempt. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 3/14/2012. (LSM)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER to Supplement State Court Record: IT IS ORDERED that within 10 days from the date of this order the Clerk of Court for the Nineteenth Judicial District Court shall supplement his response to this courts order by filing a certified copy of the e ntire State Court record as stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court serve, by certified mail or other means which provides tracking and delivery confirmation, a copy of this order on the Clerk of Court for the Nineteenth Judicial District.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 2/15/2012. (CMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
