Kirby Inland Marine LP v. LBC Houston LP, et al
Kirby Inland Marine LP |
LBC Houston, LP, LBC Operations (U.S.) LLC and LBC Baton Rouge LLC |
3:2011cv00264 |
April 21, 2011 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
Ralph E. Tyson |
Christine Noland |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 90 PARTIAL JUDGMENT granting 88 Motion for Entry of Final Judgment. JUDGMENT is hereby rendered in favor ofThird Party Defendant Intertek USA, Inc. and against Third Party Plaintiffs LBC Baton Rouge, L.L.C., LBC Houston, L.P., and LBC Opertations (U.S.), L.L.C. The Clerk of Court shall terminate Third Party Defendant Intertek USA, Inc. from this matter, and all consolidated matters. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 05/27/2014. (NLT) |
Filing 87 RULING AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Third Party Defendant Intertek, USA Inc.'s ("Intertek") Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 72) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Third Party Plaintiffs LBC Houston, L.P., LBC Baton Rouge, L.L.C., and LBC Operations (U.S.), L.L.C.'s claims against Third Party Defendant Intertek, USA Inc. are hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 3/31/2014. (PJH) |
Filing 77 RULING AND ORDER denying 56 Motion to Dismiss Third Party Complaint and 65 Motion for Conference. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 09/10/2013. (NLT) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.