Zeno v. Livingston Management, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Louisiana Middle District Zeno v. Livingston Management, Inc.

Zeno v. Livingston Management, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Mary M Zeno
Defendant:	Livingston Management, Inc.
Case Number:	3:2011cv00351
Filed:	May 26, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana
Office:	Baton Rouge Office
Presiding Judge:	Brian A. Jackson
Presiding Judge:	Christine Noland
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 7, 2014	Filing 57 ORDER: Defendant Livingston Management, Inc. shall submit a supplemental memorandum specifically addressing: (1) the degree of continuity of business operations from LMI to Huff Management Co., Inc., and from LMI to LAP RD, LLC; and (2) LMI's ab ility to provide relief to Zeno. Such memorandum shall be filed no later than 08/14/2014. Such memorandum shall address, via a sworn affidavit, LMI's: (1) current assets; (2) projected assets for 2014; (3) current liabilities; (4) projected liab ilities for 2014; (5) any insurance policies that may satisfy all or part of a possible judgment and the coverage amounts; and (6) LMI's position as to whether personal liability for all or part of a possible judgment may be imposed on LMI's corporate officers. See Rojas, 87 F.3d at 750. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 08/07/2014. (NLT)
August 26, 2013	Filing 25 RULING and ORDER denying 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 8/23/2013. (SMG)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 7, 2014

Filing 57 ORDER: Defendant Livingston Management, Inc. shall submit a supplemental memorandum specifically addressing: (1) the degree of continuity of business operations from LMI to Huff Management Co., Inc., and from LMI to LAP RD, LLC; and (2) LMI's ab ility to provide relief to Zeno. Such memorandum shall be filed no later than 08/14/2014. Such memorandum shall address, via a sworn affidavit, LMI's: (1) current assets; (2) projected assets for 2014; (3) current liabilities; (4) projected liab ilities for 2014; (5) any insurance policies that may satisfy all or part of a possible judgment and the coverage amounts; and (6) LMI's position as to whether personal liability for all or part of a possible judgment may be imposed on LMI's corporate officers. See Rojas, 87 F.3d at 750. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 08/07/2014. (NLT)

August 26, 2013

Filing 25 RULING and ORDER denying 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 8/23/2013. (SMG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zeno v. Livingston Management, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Livingston Management, Inc.
Represented By:	Anthony Todd Caruso
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary M Zeno
Represented By:	James L. Arruebarrena
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?