Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Nottingham Construction Company, LLC et al

Plaintiff: Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Defendant: Ted Christopher Hicks, Nottingham Construction Company, LLC, C&T Equipment, L.L.C., Casey Rayborn Hicks, Constance F Hicks and Ted Hicks
Case Number: 3:2011cv00590
Filed: August 26, 2011
Court: Louisiana Middle District Court
Office: Baton Rouge Office
Presiding Judge: Brian A. Jackson
Referring Judge: Stephen C. Riedlinger
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery/Enforcement
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 30, 2012 42 Opinion or Order of the Court AMENDED RULING AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment ishereby GRANTED. The Court further ORDERS Defendants to submitpayment to Plaintiff in the amount of $579,802.32, the amount of theSuspensive Appeal Bond, plus costs and attorney's fees. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 11/30/2012. (PJH)
August 29, 2011 3 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER to Amend Complaint: IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Hartford Fire Insurance Company shall have 14 days to file an Amended Complaint which clarifies the organizational form of defendants Nottingham Construction Company, L.L.C. and C&T Equipment, L.L.C., and properly alleges the citizenship of the defendant if it is a limited liability company.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 8/26/2011. (CMM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Nottingham Construction Company, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ted Christopher Hicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nottingham Construction Company, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C&T Equipment, L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Casey Rayborn Hicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Constance F Hicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ted Hicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Represented By: Richard E. Baudouin
Represented By: Matthew J. Farley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?