Smith v. Gagnard et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 24, 2012
RULING Adopting 60 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, defts 58 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and this action shall be dismissed without prejudice to any state law claim. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 7/23/2012. (JDL)
|July 23, 2012
RULING Adopting 57 Report and Recommendations, 37 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Earton Lynn Smith iS DENIED 53 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Grady Gagnard, Bruce Dodd, Kenneth Washington, is GRANTED and the claims against defendants Capt. Grady Gagnard, Msgt. Kenneth Washington and Dy. Warden Bruce Dodd are dismissed. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state law claim. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 07/23/2012.(KDC) Modified on 7/23/2012 to correct text (KDC). Modified on 7/23/2012 (KDC).
|April 30, 2012
RULING Adopting of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The partial motion to dismiss filed by Gagnard and Washington is granted insofar as defts seek dismissal of plaintiffs claims that he was issued a false disciplinary report and that the defendants violat ed DOC regulations, and the motion is denied otherwise. Plaintiffs claim that he was issued a false disciplinary report and that the department violated Department of Corrections regulations are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice to any state law claim.. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 4/30/2012. (PJH)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?