White v. Rogers et al
Sarah Odaware White |
Jim Rogers and Prison Ent Inc |
3:2011cv00628 |
September 13, 2011 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
Docia L Dalby |
Brian A. Jackson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 RULING Adopting 30 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 24 Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant, Jim Rogers, is granted, dismissing the Plaintiff's claims asserted against the Defendant, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e, but with prejudice to assertion of the same claim or claims in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Shelly D. Dick on 05/28/2013. (SMG) |
Filing 14 RULING Adopting of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (doc.. 9), is granted in part, such that the plaintiffs claims asserted against Prison Enterprises, Inc., is dismissed in their entirety, and the plaintiffs claims asserted against defendant Jim Rogers is dismissed except for the claim asserted against this defendant which seeks injunctive relief and punitive and/or nominal damages as a result of exposure to unconstitutional conditions of confinement at the Louisiana Correctional Institute for Women. This matter is referred back to US Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 7/25/2012. (PJH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.