O'Carroll v. Hancock Bank of Louisiana et al
| Jennifer O'Carroll |
| Colette Mitchell, Joy Ross, Hancock Bank of Louisiana and Blake Carlin |
| George M Gates |
| 3:2011cv00640 |
| September 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Brian A. Jackson |
| Christine Noland |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER: That pltfs motion for leave to respond to motion to dismiss 33 is DENIED AS MOOT. FURTHER ORDERED that defts motion for leave to file a reply to pltfs opposition to defts renewed motion to dismiss 35 is GRANTED; FURTHER ORDERED that defts motion to dismiss 29 is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that pltfs motion to deny motion to dismiss and motion to deny motion to dismiss and to dismiss sanctions due to the fact that interrogatories were answered and submitted to deft 34 and 36 are D ENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that the discovery deadlines are extended as follows: 1. Defts shall have 14 days to take the deposition of pltf, and pltf shall make herself available for her deposition within the next 14 days or her case will be dismissed. 2. Dispositive motion deadline is extended to 1/14/2013. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 11/30/2012. (JDL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
