United States of America v. Three Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars ($360,000.00), et al

Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Three Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars ($360,000.00) Currently Deposited AFTRAK No. 72070003-01, Seized From A JP Morgan Chase Bank Account of Wilkerson Tax Service, and One Hundred Ten Thousand Do
Case Number: 3:2011cv00703
Filed: October 18, 2011
Court: Louisiana Middle District Court
Office: Baton Rouge Office
Presiding Judge: James J. Brady
Referring Judge: Docia L Dalby
Nature of Suit: Forfeit/Penalty: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Three Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars ($360,000.00), et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: James Patrick Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Three Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars ($360,000.00) Currently Deposited AFTRAK No. 72070003-01, Seized From A JP Morgan Chase Bank Account of Wilkerson Tax Service, and One Hundred Ten Thousand Do
Represented By: Todd Samuels Clemons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.