Watkins v. Recreation and Park Commission for the City of Baton Rouge, et al
Plaintiff: Warren R Watkins
Defendant: Parish of East Baton Rouge, Recreation and Park Commission for the Ciry of Baton Rouge and City of Baton Rouge
Case Number: 3:2012cv00366
Filed: June 19, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana
Office: Baton Rouge Office
Presiding Judge: Brian A. Jackson
Presiding Judge: Stephen C. Riedlinger
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 59 Supplemental RULING on 22 MOTION for Summary Judgment: The Motion filed byRecreation and Park Commission for the Parish of East Baton Rouge is granted on the plaintiffs claims under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1), and the Louisiana Emplo yment Discrimination Law, LSA-R.S. 23:332, for disparate treatment and hostile work environment based on race, and on the plaintiffsretaliation claims under Title VII. Summary judgment is also granted to the defendant on the plaintiffs retaliation claim under the Louisiana Whistleblower Statute, LSA-R.S. 23:967. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 12/26/2013. (SMG)
December 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 56 RULING and ORDER: The 22 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted on the plaintiff's claims under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1), and the Louisiana Employment Discrimination Law, LSA-R.S. 23:332, for disparate treatment and hostile work environment based on race, and the plaintiff's retaliation claim under Title VII. The parties shall have until 12/23/2013 to file a supplemental memorandum and direct the court's attention to any specific evidence in the summary judgment materials they contend is relevant to the determination of whether there is a genuine dispute for trial on the plaintiff's claim under LSA-R.S. 23:967. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 12/13/2013. (NLT)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Watkins v. Recreation and Park Commission for the City of Baton Rouge, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Parish of East Baton Rouge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Recreation and Park Commission for the Ciry of Baton Rouge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Baton Rouge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Warren R Watkins
Represented By: Dan Michael Scheuermann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?