Williams v. Sanders et al
| Ronald Williams |
| John Doe 1, John Doe 2, Joshua Francois and John Sanders |
| 3:2012cv00475 |
| August 7, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| James J. Brady |
| Docia L Dalby |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
RULING AND ORDER denying 61 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 9/14/2015. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
70
RULING AND ORDER as to 68 Request for Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Fact filed by Ronald Williams. Plaintiff's Exhibit 3 (Product Literature for Sabre Red Chemical Spray) shall be admitted into evidence. See Defendant's Supplemental Responses to Plaintiff's Requests for Production of Documents (Docs. 23 & 23-1); Suit No. USM-11-677 Docs. 70 and 71, paragraph 6. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 7/21/2015. (LLH) Modified on 7/21/2015 to edit text (LLH).
|
|
Filing
40
RULING adopting 39 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 37 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part. This matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings in connection with the Plaintiff's claim that Defendants Sanders and Morris utilized excessive force against him. Signed by District Judge Shelly D. Dick on 1/6/2014. (SMG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
