Felder's Collision Parts, Inc. v. General Motors Company et al
Felder's Collision Parts, Inc. |
General Motors Company, All Star Advertising Agency Inc., All Star Chevrolet North, L.L.C., All Star Chevrolet, Inc. and Joe Doe Defendants 1-25 |
3:2012cv00646 |
October 12, 2012 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
James J. Brady |
Stephen C. Riedlinger |
Anti-Trust |
15 U.S.C. ยง 2 Antitrust Litigation |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 RULING: The Defendants' 54 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. All of the claims contained in the 50 Amended Complaint are DISMISSED. The 57 and 60 Motions for Leave as amicus curiae are DISMISSED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 4/23/2014. (SMG) |
Filing 47 RULING granting 43 Motion to Compel Responses to Requests for Production of Documents and denying as moot 44 Ex Parte Motion for Expedited Consideration of Motion to Compel Responses to Requests for Production of Documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 08/27/2013. (CGP) |
Filing 40 PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 6/25/2013. (LLH) |
Filing 32 RULING denying 22 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiff's request for leave to amend (Doc. 25 at 22-23) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 4/16/2013. (LLH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.