Lewis v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Brian Lewis |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
3:2012cv00747 |
November 27, 2012 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
Brian A. Jackson |
Magistrate Judge Unassigned |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 102 ORDER granting 79 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Shelly D. Dick on 10/31/2013. (LLH) |
Filing 94 RULING denying 87 Motion to Amend Complaint; denying as moot 87 Motion to Expedite because October 21, 2013 has passed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr on 10/30/2013. (LLH) |
Filing 48 RULING: Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss the Recusal Motions is GRANTED, thereby DENYING his three pending motions to recuse. Plaintiff's Expedited Motion to Request a Master on Case Number 12-747 Under Rule 53 is DENIED. Plaintiff's two expedi ted motions for pre-trial hearings or demand settlement hearings are DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Consideration of His Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Rulings on May 9, 2013; June 18, 2013; and July 17, 2013 is hereby GRANT ED in part and DENIED in Part. Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED as to being considered expeditiously; however, the Court AFFIRMS the aforementioned Magistrate Judge's rulings thereby DENYING Plaintiff's request to overrule them. Furthermore, the Court hereby refers Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time on Request About Subpoena to the Magistrate Judge. Signed by District Judge Shelly D. Dick on 07/31/2013. (NLT) |
Filing 41 ORDER denying as futile 33 MOTION for Leave to Amend Complaint, and denying as moot 33 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. To the extent that Plaintiff seeks discovery from nonparties, IT IS ORDERED that his Motion is DENIED for his failure t o comply with the subpoena requirements of Rule 45. If Plaintiff wishes to obtain information from a party to the suit, his Motion is DENIED for his failure to comply with the discovery provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court refers Plaintiff to its discussion of those provisions in its previous Order (R. Doc. 19) denying his Motion to Compel (R. Doc. 5). Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr on 07/16/2013. (CGP) |
Filing 37 RULING Adopting 23 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 2 Motion to Remand is hereby DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 07/10/2013. (CGP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lewis v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | |
Represented By: | Robert W. Barton |
Represented By: | Harry Joseph Philips, Jr. |
Represented By: | L. Adam Thames |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Brian Lewis | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.