Minnis v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College et al
| Anthony Minnis |
| Eddie Nunez, Joseph Alleva, Miriam Segar and Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College |
| 3:2013cv00005 |
| January 3, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Brian A. Jackson |
| Magistrate Judge Unassigned |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
RULING AND ORDER granting 59 Motion for Summary Judgment. Minnis's claims against LSU are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. LSU's request that all costs be taxed against Minnis is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 10/21/2014. (NLT)
|
|
Filing
40
RULING granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion to Compel. The portion of the motion as it pertains to Request for Production Nos. 6 and 7 is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr on 12/4/2013. (SMG)
|
|
Filing
25
RULING AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 8 Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and 21 Supplemental Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 09/17/2013. (NLT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
