Hampton v. Cain et al
| Michael Hampton |
| Unknown Benjaman, Burl Cain and James Leblanc |
| 3:2013cv00015 |
| January 7, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Brian A. Jackson |
| Magistrate Judge Unassigned |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
RULING AND ORDER denying 91 MOTION Requesting Stay of Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 3/19/2015. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
88
RULING and ORDER adopting 87 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff Michael Hampton's 55 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, and the Defendants' 40 Rule 12(B)(6) Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, dismissing P laintiff's claims asserted against the Defendants, with prejudice. Plaintiff's 63 Motion for Preliminary/Preventive Injunction is DENIED. Plaintiff's 78 Motion/Application for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. Plaintiff's 80 Motio n Requesting Preliminary Injunction and also a Restraining Order against Defendant(s) in Accordance with FRCP Rule 65(a),(b),(1),(3); and Also Title 18 Section 3626(a),(2); AD Testitificandum is DENIED. The above captioned matter is DISMISSED, and the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law claims. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 2/21/2014. (SMG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
