Hensley v. Chaffin et al
Plaintiff: Donald Hensley, Jr.
Defendant: Unknown Chaffin and Unknown Perkins
Case Number: 3:2013cv00280
Filed: May 2, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana
Office: Baton Rouge Office
Presiding Judge: Shelly D. Dick
Presiding Judge: Richard L. Bourgeois
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 163 RULING and ORDER: The Plaintiff's 156 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Under Rule 50(b) and 157 Motion for New Trial or for Amendment or Alteration of the Judgment Under Rule 59 are DENIED. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 5/2/2016. (BLR)
February 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 99 RULING Adopting 93 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED, dismissing the plaintiff's claim for monetary damages asserted against the defendants in their officia l capacities and dismissing the plaintiff's claims regarding the alleged issuance of a false disciplinary charge and the alleged failure to follow prison rules and procedures. FURTHER the plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Suppleme ntal Motion for Summary Judgment are DENIED and this matter is referred back for further proceedings in connection with the plaintiff's claim that the defendants failed to protect him from harm at the hands of a co-inmate on April 28, 2012, and that such failure was motivated by retaliatory animus on the part of defendant Lucien Chaffin. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 02/25/2015. (NLT)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER granting in part 59 Motion to Make Disclosure, 61 Supplemental Motion to Compel Discovery and 62 Motion to Compel Production of Documents, such that, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, the defendants shall provide to the plaintiff, and file with the Court, (1) a certified copy of excerpts from the tier logbooks for Cuda 3 Unit and Cuda 4 Unit at Camp J at LSP for the date 05/28/2012, and (2) a certified copy of the tier rosters (redacted if appropriate) id entifying the inmates housed on Cuda 3 Unit and Cuda 4 Unit at Camp J at LSP for the date 05/28/2012 The plaintiff's 68 Motion for Sanctions and the defendant's corresponding request for reimbursement of reasonable expenses be and they are hereby DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr on 07/01/2014. (CGP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hensley v. Chaffin et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Chaffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Perkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald Hensley, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?