Posey v. Rogers et al
Petitioner: Ashley Posey
Respondent: James Caldwell and James Rogers
Case Number: 3:2013cv00285
Filed: May 3, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana
Office: Baton Rouge Office
Presiding Judge: Brian A. Jackson
Presiding Judge: Richard L. Bourgeois
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 32 OPINION Adopting 24 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The petitioner's application for habeas corpus relief is dismissed, with prejudice, as untimely. In the event that the petitioner seeks to pursue an appeal, a certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 1/2/2018. (EDC)
September 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 25 OPINION Adopting 24 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The petitioner's application for habeas corpus relief is dismissed, with prejudice, as untimely. In the event that the petitioner seeks to pursue an appeal, a certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 09/07/2016. (NLT)
April 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER: Within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, the Warden ofthe LA Correctional Institute for Women, Jim Rogers, shall file with the Clerk of this Court an affidavit describing the prison mailing system as it operated in October, 2008. Wit hin thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, thepetitioner shall file with the Clerk of this Court any documentation within her possession or control that may support her contention that she placed an application for supervisory review addressed t o the Louisiana Supreme Court into the prison mail system on or about October 14, 2008. The affidavit of Warden Rogers shall also provide information regarding inmate Poseys prison account during the month of October and November, 2008, specifically including information concerning purchases or expenditures for postage charges. The Clerk of Court shall mail copies of the following documents to Warden Jim Rogers at the Louisiana Correctional Institute for Women: (1) A copy of this Order; and(2) A copy of Inmate Poseys purported cover letter addressed to the Louisiana Supreme Court, dated October 14, 2008 (R. Doc. 12-1, p. 1). Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr on 04/28/2015. (BCL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Posey v. Rogers et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: James Caldwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: James Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ashley Posey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?