Robinson et al v. City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 22, 2017
ORDER denying 139 Motion for Taxation of Costs and Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 05/22/2017. (ELW)
|October 28, 2016
AMENDMENT TO RULING AND ORDER re: 115 Order on Motion for Summary. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 10/28/2016. (LLH)
|October 22, 2016
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 62 Motion for Summary Judgment...IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED in that the following of the Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: (1) the substantive due process claim, (2) the procedural due process claim, and (3) the categorical takings (Lucas) claim; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in all other respects, the Defendants' motion is DENIED. Trial will proceed on the following claims: (1) the as applied (Penn Centra l) takings claim, (2) the Monell claim, and (3) the state law takings claim. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by Monday, October 24, 2016, at 12:00 p.m., the parties shall file into the record trial briefs no longer than five pages addressing how this rul ing impacts the parties' currently pending motions in limine. The parties shall also inform the Court of which of their proposed jury instructions they wish to withdraw as no longer necessary. The parties are not entitled to file new motions in limine or seek the exclusion of additional evidence,and they are not entitled to submit new proposed jury instruction. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 10/22/2016. (KDC)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?