Maes v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections
| David Maes |
| Burl Cain, Tim Delaney, Louisiana Dept. of Corrections, Unknown Maples and Unknown Wells |
| 3:2013cv00595 |
| September 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| James J. Brady |
| Stephen C. Riedlinger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
RULING Adopting 37 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The Cross Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice to any state law claim. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 05/14/2015. (NLT)
|
|
Filing
21
RULING Affirming and Adopting the 20 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The Court GRANTS IN PART the defendant's 14 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and thus (1) DISMISSES all claims against Warden Burl Cain an d Camp C Warden Tim Delaney WITH PREJUDICE, and (2) DISMISSES all claims against Major Phillip Maples, except for the plaintiff's excessive force claim WITH PREJUDICE. The Court DISMISSES the claims against Captain Wells and the Louisiana Department of Public Safely and Corrections. The Court REFERS the case back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 7/7/2014. (LLH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
