Overman v. City of East Baton Rouge et al
Plaintiff: April Overman
Defendant: City of East Baton Rouge and Melvin Skip Holden
Case Number: 3:2013cv00614
Filed: September 18, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana
Office: Baton Rouge Office
Presiding Judge: James J. Brady
Presiding Judge: Stephen C. Riedlinger
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 152 RULING AND ORDER : The Motion for 129 Summary Judgment on Mitigation and Damagesfiled by plaintiff April Overman is DENIED and the issues of mitigation and damages shall be referred to a trial on the merits. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 05/15/2017. (ELW)
November 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 92 RULING: The 76 Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs is granted. Plaintiff is awarded reasonable attorney's fees in the amount of $23,591.25. Plaintiff's request for an award of nontaxable costs is granted in the amount of $352.94, and motion is denied as the remaining costs. A separate judgment will be entered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 11/24/2015. (LLH)
September 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 74 OPINION: Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, judgment will be entered in favor of plaintiff April Overman and against defendants City of East Baton Rouge and Mayor Melvin "Kip" Holden, in his official capacity, in the amount of $272,148, plus interest. A separate judgment will be entered. Any motion for an award of attorney's fees and non-taxable costs shall be made as provided by Rule 54(d)(2), Fed.R.Civ.P. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 9/22/2015. (BCL)
March 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 41 RULING: The 35 Motion in Limine is denied without prejudice to the defendants objecting to specific evidence at the trial. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 03/04/2015. (BCL)
January 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 32 RULING denying 20 MOTION for Summary Judgment of plaintiff April Overman. The 28 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants the City of Baton Rouge and Mayor Melvin "Kip" Holden is also denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 01/15/2015. (BCL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Overman v. City of East Baton Rouge et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of East Baton Rouge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Melvin Skip Holden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: April Overman
Represented By: John Michael Lawrence
Represented By: John Oliver Pieksen, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?