Lowe et al v. Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford
| Reginald Lowe and Ludmila Belayev |
| Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford |
| 3:2013cv00615 |
| June 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Brian A. Jackson |
| Stephen C. Riedlinger |
| Insurance |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 635 Breach of Insurance Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
RULING: The 20 MOTION to Quash Subpoena and Notice of Deposition of Kevin Collet filed by Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford is granted. The deadline to complete fact discovery is extended to 02/14/2014, solely for the purpose of deposing Kevin Collett. The date, time and place for his deposition shall be selected, and a notice of deposition shall be filed, by no later than 01/31/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 01/24/2014. (NLT)
|
|
Filing
19
RULING: The defendant's 15 Motion for Expedited Consideration of Motion to Compel Inspection and Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time to Exchange Expert Report is granted, and the defendant's 12 Motion to Compel Inspection of Property and its 13 Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time to Exchange Expert Report are both denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 12/13/2013. (NLT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
