Gage v. Jenkins et al
| Christopher Gage |
| Linden Franklin, Eric Hinyard, Unknown Jarvis, Leon Jenkins, Unknown Johnson, Robert Rowe and Tywanna Taylor |
| 3:2013cv00638 |
| October 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Shelly D. Dick |
| Stephen C. Riedlinger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
192
ORDER denying 185 Motion for Rule to Show Cause Why an Injunction Should Not Issue. Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 9/17/2018. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
187
RULING denying 180 Motion to Alter and/or Amend Judgment and/or Motion for New Trial. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 10/19/2017. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
159
RULING granting in part 127 Motion in Limine such that the expert testimony of Kerry J. Najolia shall be disallowed; and otherwise denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 5/18/2017. (EDC)
|
|
Filing
145
RULING granting in part and denying in part 109 Motions in Limine/ MOTION for Dauber/Kumho Hearing for Admissibility of Expert Witnesses, MOTION to Forbid Mention of criminal Conviction and Prison Disciplinary Record, NOTICE of Intent to Use Evide nce of Other crimes of Bad Acts("OCOBA") for Impeachment or other Purposes Authorized Under FRE404(B)(2), MOTION Requesting Permission for Assistance from Inmate Counsel Substitute During Pre-Trial Hearings, MOTION to Appoint Counsel for Limited Purposes at Trial. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 3/29/2017. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
143
RULING denying 105 Motion to Reopen Partial Pre-Trial Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 3/13/2017. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
89
RULING: The Plaintiff's claims asserted against the Defendants in their official capacities are hereby DISMISSED. FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Rec. Docs. 56, 79 and 84) are hereby DENIED, and this matter is hereby referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings in connections with Plaintiff's claim that the Defendants, in their individual capacities, violated his Eighth Amendments constitutional rights on 11/3/2012. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 9/24/2015. (JDL)
|
|
Filing
72
RULING : In the interest of justice, and in accordance with FRCP Rule 56(d), the Court declines to adopt the 67 recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and ruling on the Defendant's 56 Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby DEFERRED, with out prejudice to re-urging. This matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings consistent with this Ruling, including but not limited to the issuance of any Orders determined by the Magistrate Judge to be appropriate in light FRCP Rule 56(d) and (e). Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 12/4/2014. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
71
RULING Adopting the 66 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 18 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED and this matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 12/3/2014. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
22
RULING adopting 17 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The Defendants' 11 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted is DENIED, and this matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 7/18/2014. (SMG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
