Higginbotham .v. Donald et al
| Brittany Jacks Higginbotham |
| Old Republic Insurance Company, Penske Truck Leasing Corporation, Ramona-Jo G. Donald, Companion Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Charles R. Brown and Wilmac Enterprises, L.L.C. |
| Wilmac Enterprises, L.L.C., Companion Property and Casualty Insurance Company and Charles Brown |
| Ramona Donald |
| 3:2013cv00646 |
| September 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Shelly D. Dick |
| Richard L. Bourgeois |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
RULING and ORDER adopting 9 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's 4 Motion to Remand is GRANTED and this matter is remanded to the 18th JDC. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 5/14/2014. (SMG) (Main Document 10 replaced on 5/14/2014) (SMG).
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to 4 MOTION to Remand . The Removing Defendants are denied leave to conduct jurisdictional discovery, including depositions, regarding the a lleged improper joinder of defendant Ramona-Jo G. Donald. The Removing Defendants shall have until 12/2/2013 to file their opposition, if any, to Plaintiffs 4 Motion to Remand. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr on 11/19/2013. (LLH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
