Thomas v. Cain et al
| Donald Thomas |
| N. Burl Cain, Jason Collins, Stephanie Lamartiniere, Randy Lavesphere, Hal McMurdo, Kenneth Norris and Rahm Singh |
| 3:2013cv00673 |
| October 10, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Brian A. Jackson |
| Stephen C. Riedlinger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
OPINION Adopting the 33 U.S. Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The defendant's 17 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part, dismissing the plaintiff's Eighth Amendment deliberate medical indifference claims arising before 6/8/2012, and his claim based on the requirement that he and other inmates make a co-payment insofar as such claim is based on a violation of the Eighth Amendment. The plaintiff's 30 Memorandum in Support is treated as a motio n for summary judgment and is denied. The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state law claims and that these claims are dismissed without prejudice and this action is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings on the plaintiff's Eighth Amendment deliberate medical indifference claims arising on or after 6/8/2012, based on the failure to provide hip and hernia surgery. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 2/11/2015. (LLH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
