Rios v. The Mall of Louisiana et al
||Xencom Facility Management, LLC, The Mall of Louisiana and ABC Insurance Company
||Juana I. Rios
||November 15, 2013
||Louisiana Middle District Court
||Baton Rouge Office
||Brian A. Jackson
||Richard L. Bourgeois
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28:1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 25, 2014
ORDER: Pursuant to 28 USC 1653, on or before 4/14/2014, the removing defendants shall file a second amended notice of removal providing the citizenship of GGP Limited Partnership by setting forth all citizenship particulars required to sustain federa l diversity jurisdiction. Defendant shall file a memorandum concerning subject matter jurisdiction, specifically, the amount in controversy requirement for diversity jurisdiction on or before 4/14/2014. Plaintiff shall file a memorandum concerning the same on or before 5/5/2014. Amended Pleadings due by 4/14/2014. Brief due by 4/14/2014. Brief due by 5/5/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr on 3/25/2014. (SMG)
|May 28, 2014
RULING AND ORDER approving the 14 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 13 Motion for Voluntary Remand is GRANTED and this action is REMANDED to the 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, State of Louisiana. (certified copy mailed to appropriate judicial district court). Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 05/28/2014.(NLT)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.