Hills v. Cain et al
Rickey Hills |
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell |
3:2014cv00016 |
January 7, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
James J. Brady |
Stephen C. Riedlinger |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 OPINION Adopting 23 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The Petition Under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody is denied. A certificate of appealability is denied for the reasons set forth in the report and recommendation issued by the magistrate judge. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 3/6/2015. (SMG) |
Filing 15 ORDER: Within 14 days the parties shall submit affidavits, documents, or other evidence to establish when the petitioner delivered his writ of review to a prison officer. Affidavits may include those of the petitioner as well as those of prison offic ials; documentary evidence may include draw slips for postage, mail logs, post office receipts, or similar documents. The court may require the parties to present oral testimony at an evidentiary hearing if the affidavits and documentary evidence are not sufficient to make a determination.A party's failure to timely respond to this order may result in a determination adverse to that party's position. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 11/19/2014. (NLT) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.