Costly v. Nissan Motor Company, Ltd et al
| Lakiva K. Costly |
| Nissan Motor Company, Ltd and Nissan North America, Inc. |
| 3:2014cv00244 |
| April 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Brian A. Jackson |
| Stephen C. Riedlinger |
| Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
129
RULING granting 87 Omnibus Motion in Limine to exclude the recorded statement of Rachelle Bethley and the witnesses not disclosed by Plaintiff in response to discovery. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 12/1/2016. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
83
RULING granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's res ipsa loquitur claim is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs construction or composition claim is set for trial. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 9/13/2016. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER AND REASONS granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion to Quash Defendant's Subpoena Duces Tecum Directed to the Louisiana State Office of Risk Management and for Protective Order. The Motion is GRANTED as it relates to the subpoena issued to ORM, which is quashed. With respect to ORM's request for a protective order, the Motion is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 6/21/2016. (LLH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
