J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. The Tiger Paw Daiquiris & Grill, L.L.C. et al
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. |
Bryan L. Addington, Astro's Tiger Paw, Inc., Ronald D. Boies, Robert J. Cazes, Robert F. Durr, Jr., Kyle M. Masterson and The Tiger Paw Daiquiris & Grill, L.L.C. |
3:2014cv00268 |
May 1, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
Brian A. Jackson |
Richard L. Bourgeois |
Cable/Satellite TV |
47 U.S.C. ยง 0605 Communications Act of 1934 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 RULING and ORDER granting 27 Motion for Default Judgment Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 55. Defendants The Tiger Paw DaiquiTis & Grill, LLC, Astra's Tiger Paw, Inc., and Robert J. Cazes shall pay Plaintiff $4,400 in statuto ry damages, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 553(c)(3)(A)(ii), and $13,200 in additional damages, pursuant to 47 U.S. C. § 553(c)(3)(B), for a total of $17,600. A separate judgment in favor of Plaintiff shall issue in accordance with Rule 58. Plaintiff is awarded costs pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 553(c)(2)(C), and shall file a Memorandum of Costs in the form required by the Clerk of Court within thirty days of entry of the Judgment, in accordance with LR 54( c) (effective 4/2/2015). Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 04/16/2015. (BCL) Modified to edit text on 4/16/2015 (BCL). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.