George v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections et al
| Trussell George |
| Whalen Gibbs, James M. LeBlanc, Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Gerald Starks and Scott Tubbs |
| 3:2014cv00338 |
| May 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Brian A. Jackson |
| Stephen C. Riedlinger |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
169
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: Plaintiffs renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law is DENIED and Plaintiffs claims are DENIED in all respects. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff by separate document in conformity with Rule 58. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 9/29/2017. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER AND RULING as to 74 , 76 MOTIONS for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 6/23/2016. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
122
ORDER denying 107 Motion in Limine to Exclude Plaintiff's Expert Witness Delany M. Smith, M.D. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 06/20/2016. (ELW)
|
|
Filing
52
RULING AND ORDER denying 34 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, filed by Defendant Charles P Vosburg, Ph.D. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 4/29/2015. (LLH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
