Williams v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company
| Allen Williams |
| E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company |
| 3:2014cv00382 |
| June 20, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Brian A. Jackson |
| Stephen C. Riedlinger |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
144
RULING that the Daubert Motion to Exclude Causation OpinionTestimony of Alan L Taylor PhD (Doc. 63) filed by DuPont is DENIED. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 04/11/2016. (ELW)
|
|
Filing
94
RULING ON APPEAL : The Court hereby AFFIRMS the 54 RULING denying Motion to Compel Discovery in all respects except the award of $500 in reasonable expenses to the Defendant. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 3/7/2016. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
75
RULING AND ORDER...IT IS ORDERED that E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company's Motion to Dismiss Hostile Work Environment Claims Under Rule 12(b)(6) (Doc. 52) is hereby GRANTED; DuPont's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in that, under Title VII, A llen Williams has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies for a hostile work environment because a hostile work environment claim cannot reasonably grow out of the allegations of Williams' original EEOC charge and EEOC amendment. Thus, Wil liams' hostile work environment claim underTitle VII is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DuPont's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in that, under section 1981, Williams has failed to allege sufficient facts to establish a hostile work environment. Thus, Williams' hostilework environment claims under section 1981 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Williams request for leave to amend (Doc. 55 at 7) isDENIED in that Williams request is futile because he seeks to allege untimely, unrelated, and conclusory facts. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 12/30/15. (KDC)
|
|
Filing
68
SUPPLEMENTAL RULING on 58 Motion for for Extension of Dispositive and/or Duabert Motion Deadline. The defendant's motions are granted. The Amended Scheduling Order previously issued in each case will be further amended to extend the deadline to file dispositive motions to 30 days after the district judge rules in each case on the plaintiff's objections to the discovery ruling. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 10/27/2015. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
54
RULING denying 41 Motion to Compel Discovery. Pursuant to Rule 37(a)(5)(B), the plaintiff shall pay to the defendant, within 14 days, reasonable expenses in the amount of $500.00. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 9/8/2015. (BCL)
|
|
Filing
51
RULING and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 9 Motion for Partial Dismissal, or in the Alternative, Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Defendant's motion is GRANTED in that, as a matter of law, Plaintiffs § 1981 claims that a re prior to June 20, 2010 are time barred by the four year statute of limitations under 28 U.S.C. § 1658(a). Defendant's motion is GRANTED in that, as a matter of law, Plaintiffs Title VII claims that are prior to 2010 are not actionable as discrete discriminatory acts because Plaintiff failed toadministratively exhaust these claims. To the extent that DuPont's motion was intended to reach a hostile work environment claim, DuPont's Motion for Partial Dismissal is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DuPont is granted leave to file a motion to dismiss on this issue. In all other respects Defendant's motion is DENIED. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 7/8/2015. (BCL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Allen Williams | |
| Represented By: | Jane H. Barney |
| Represented By: | Smith Law FIrm |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
