Carroll et al v. Abide et al
| Pamela Carroll Alonso, Carolyn K. Carroll and William D. Carroll, Jr. |
| Samera L. Abide and XYZ Insurance Company |
| 3:2014cv00503 |
| August 12, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Brian A. Jackson |
| Stephen C. Riedlinger |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
RULING and ORDER: Defendant's 45 Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(B)11 (Doc. 45) is GRANTED. All of Plaintiff Pamela Carroll Alonso's claims against Defendant are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1). All of Plainti ffs William and Carolyn Carroll's claims against Defendant are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). All of Plaintiffs William and Carolyn Carroll's claims against XYZ Insurance Company are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for all of the reasons provided herein. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 3/10/2016. (BLR)
|
|
Filing
11
RULING AND ORDER granting 9 MOTION for Leave to File Reply Memorandum and 3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Specifically, the Court dismisses the Carroll's Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1). Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 10/1/2014. (NLT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
