George v. Fresenius Medical Care North America et al
Plaintiff: Tammy George
Defendant: Fresenius Medical Care North America, Sheryl Wilcutt and XYZ Insurance Company
Case Number: 3:2015cv00014
Filed: January 12, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana
Office: Baton Rouge Office
Presiding Judge: John W. deGravelles
Presiding Judge: Richard L. Bourgeois
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 57 RULING : Plaintiff's 52 Motion to and for Leave to Exceed Page Limits and Motion to Strike the Incorrect Pleading and Allow Filing Out of Time Memorandum in Opposition to Summary Judgment is DENIED. BMA's 31 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 9/15/2016. (LLH)
September 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 56 RULING denying 29 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 9/9/2016. (LLH)
August 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER: BMAs Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony 30 isGRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiffs Motion for Extension 39 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 08/01/2016. (ELW)
May 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 37 RULING denying BMS'S 20 Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Judicial Estoppel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr on 5/27/2016. (LLH)
June 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 15 OPINION Adopting the 13 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's claims against defendant Sheryl Wilcutt are dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to effect service pursuant to Rule 4(m) ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 6/24/2015. (LLH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: George v. Fresenius Medical Care North America et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fresenius Medical Care North America
Represented By: Andrew Phelps Burnside
Represented By: Jennifer L. Englander
Represented By: Matthew Miles McCluer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sheryl Wilcutt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: XYZ Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tammy George
Represented By: Kevin Lovell James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?