Johnson v. Holliday et al
Plaintiff: Tony Johnson
Defendant: Louisiana Department of Corrections, Tyler Holliday and Joseph LeMartiniere
Case Number: 3:2015cv00038
Filed: January 27, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana
Office: Baton Rouge Office
Presiding Judge: John W. deGravelles
Presiding Judge: Richard L. Bourgeois
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 292 RULING AND ORDER denying 277 Motion for New Trial. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 1/26/2021. (EDC)
February 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 123 ORDER: Defendants Motion to Compel 108 is GRANTED to the extent it seeks an order requiring Plaintiff to supplement his responses to Request for Production No. 7 and No. 10. Plaintiff must provide a supplemental production and/or privilege log on or before February 17, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 02/06/2017. (ELW)
September 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER: The 58 , 69 Motions are GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as detailed in this Order. Plaintiff and DPSC are to bear their own costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 9/22/2016. (LLH)
June 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER: Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Mitochondrial DNA Testing at Plaintiffs Cost [R. Doc. 33] is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 06/09/2016. (ELW)
May 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 Motion to Compel. Parties shall bear their own costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr on 5/27/2016. (LLH)
May 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 50 RULING granting 43 Motion to Dismiss pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 12(b)(1). Defendants, Tyler Holliday and Joseph Lamartiniere, are DISMISSED in their official capacity with prejudice, and the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 5/17/2016. (LLH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Holliday et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Louisiana Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tyler Holliday
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph LeMartiniere
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tony Johnson
Represented By: Joseph Jerome Long
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?