Jackson v. Louisiana Department Of Public Safety and Corrections et al
| Freddie Jackson |
| Louisiana Correctional Institute for Women and Louisiana Department Of Public Safety and Corrections |
| 3:2015cv00490 |
| July 27, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| James J. Brady |
| Richard L. Bourgeois |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
RULING granting 31 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Prescription and Prematurity and 32 Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs Claims of Race Discrimination and Retaliation Under the FMLA and Title VII. Plaintiff Freddie Jacksons claims against the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections and the Louisiana Correctional Institute for Women are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 6/27/2017. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
28
RULING denying 25 Motion for Reconsideration. The 24 Motion to Stay Deadlines is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 7/11/2016. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
22
RULING granting 15 Motion for Leave to Appeal an Interlocutory Order. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 5/2/2016. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
14
RULING: The 6 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 2/4/2016. (BCL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
