McMillan et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
| David McMillan and Jennifer McMillan |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank NA and JPMorgan Chase National Corporate Services Inc. |
| 3:2015cv00500 |
| July 31, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Shelly D. Dick |
| Richard L. Bourgeois |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
RULING denying 41 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 02/06/2017. (NLT)
|
|
Filing
69
RULING granting 33 Motion in Limine and 35 Motion in Limine. Both the Plaintiffs' expert, Gary S. Nelson, and the Defendant's expert, Fred H. Vanderbrook, shall be excluded. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 2/3/2017. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER denying 26 Motion to Compel Additional Rule 30(b)(6) Testimony of CBRE, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 1/25/2017. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER: The 21 Motion for Reconsideration or to Alter or Amend Judgment, is GRANTED IN PART to the extent it seeks reconsideration of the Courts 8/26/2016 19 Order and DENIED IN PART to the extent it seeks alteration of that Order. Chase's 20 Amended Answer shall remain in the record. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 9/22/2016. (LLH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
