Deal v. Dept of Corrections et al
| Alfred Deal |
| Unknown Adams, Unknown Cowan, Dept of Corrections, Jane Doe, John Doe, A. Frye, Unknown Hawkins, Unknown Haynes, Unknown Howard, Unknown Poret, Unknown Webb and L. Williams |
| 3:2015cv00534 |
| August 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Brian A. Jackson |
| Stephen C. Riedlinger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
RULING and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 44 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's state law claim for negligence arising from Defendant's failure to protect him is DISMISSED. Plaintiff's Section 1983 claim fo r falsification of documents is DISMISSED. Plaintiff's Section 1983 failure to protect claim is DISMISSED. Plaintiff's Section 1983 excessive force claim against Captain Webb is DISMISSED. Plaintiff's Section 1983 deliberate indifference to his medical needs claim is DISMISSED. Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 12/22/2017. (EDC)
|
|
Filing
38
RULING AND ORDER granting 30 Motion to Dismiss ; granting in part and denying in part 31 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 08/09/2016. (ELW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
