Rodgers v. State of Louisiana Board of Nursing
| Kourtney S Rodgers |
| State of Louisiana Board of Nursing |
| 3:2015cv00615 |
| September 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| James J. Brady |
| Stephen C. Riedlinger |
| Anti-Trust |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
RULING denying Rogers' 36 Motion for Reconsideration and granting the defendant's 21 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 12/18/2015. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
34
RULING AND ORDER: After the defendant moved to strike the Opposition, Rodgers filed a Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limits. Having stricken the Opposition from the record for the reasons stated above, the plaintiff's 33 Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limits is MOOT. The 29 Opposition violated this Court's Briefing Notice because it was untimely and exceeded the page limit. Accordingly, the Defendant's 30 Motion to Strike Document 29 from the Record is GRANTED, and the Plaintiff's 33 Motion for Leave is MOOT. The non-complying 29 opposition is hereby STRICKEN from the record. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 10/26/2015. (BCL)
|
|
Filing
15
RULING re 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue filed by State of Louisiana Board of Nursing. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 9/10/15. (crt,DickersonSld, D) [Transferred from Louisiana Western on 9/11/2015.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
