Patton v. Cain et al
Billy Patton |
N. Burl Cain and Jeff Landry |
Darryl Vannoy |
3:2016cv00010 |
January 13, 2016 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
John W. deGravelles |
Erin Wilder-Doomes |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 RULING: Petitioner's 21 Motion is GRANTED. Petitioner shall file his Notice of Appeal within ten days of this Ruling. Petitioner's 4/29/2019 payment to the Clerk of Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in the amount of $505.00 be deemed good and sufficient for his future filing of a Notice of Appeal in the above-captioned matter. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 5/30/2019. (KAH) |
Filing 19 OPINION Adopting Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge:The consolidated applications of Billy Patton for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 are SEVERED for purposes of entry of judgment;Patton's pro se hab eas petition in Civil Action 16-10 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust state court remedies: Pattons habeas petition in Civil Action 16-40 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as procedurally defaulted; In the event the Petitioner seeks to pursue an appeal, a certificate of appealability shall be DENIED. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 03/29/2019. (KDC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.