Williams v. Louisiana et al
| Mitchell Williams |
| Erin Delany, Illinois, Heather V. Kimmons, Louisiana, Secretary of State of Hawaii and Secretary of State of New Mexico |
| 3:2016cv00093 |
| February 12, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Shelly D. Dick |
| Erin Wilder-Doomes |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 02 U.S.C. ยง 437 Federal Election Commission |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
RULING : Defendant's 19 NOTICE of Appeal, to the extent it may be interpreted as a request for a certificate of appealibility, is DENIED. The 20 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis, is also DENIED. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 8/1/2017. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
17
RULING Adopting the 13 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. This matter shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 8/10/2016. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
9
RULING denying 8 MOTION to allow plaintiff to attend by telephone and MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Mitchell Williams. Plaintiff is again advised that failure to appear at the May 16, 2016 conference in person may result in dismissal of this action without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 05/06/2016. (ELW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
