Flowers v. Dupont et al
| James E. Flowers |
| Barrett Boeker, Leslie Dupont, David Lane and Chad Menzina |
| 3:2016cv00263 |
| April 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Shelly D. Dick |
| Erin Wilder-Doomes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
RULING Adopting 26 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Granting 20 Motion for Summary Judgment, and Plaintiff's claim and this matter is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 9/27/2018. (EDC)
|
|
Filing
15
RULING Adopting 11 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Granted in part 8 Motion to Dismiss, dismissing Plaintiff's claim for monetary damages asserted against Defendants in their official capacities and dismissing all of Plaintiff's claims asserted against Defendants, Leslie Dupont, Chad Menzina, and Barrett Boeker, with prejudice. It is further ordered that the Motion to Dismiss be otherwise denied relative to Defendant, David Lane, and that this matter be refe rred back for further proceedings in connection with Plaintiff's claim that Defendant, David Lane, in his individual capacity, violated Plaintiff's constitutional rights by failing to protect Plaintiff from harm at the hands of a co-inmate on August 14, 2015. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 8/15/2017. (EDC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
