Horton v. G4S Solutions (USA) Inc., et al.
| Kimberly Horton |
| John Doe and G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc |
| 3:2016cv00544 |
| August 17, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| James J. Brady |
| Erin Wilder-Doomes |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
RULING granting 48 Motion for Summary Judgment. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 4/27/2018. (SGO)
|
|
Filing
45
NOTICE AND ORDER: as to 43 Amended MOTION to Compel Discovery Responses MOTION for Extension of Discovery Deadlines filed by Kimberly Horton. Plaintiff and defendant G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc. must confer regarding the 43 Amended Motion to Compel as required by Federal Rule 37(a)(1).3 Plaintiff shall file certification of the conference on or before 10/3/2017. If the conference resolves this matter, a Motion to Withdraw shall be filed by 10/3/2017. If the conference does not resolve the compel issues, a memorandum in opposition shall be filed by 10/9/2017. The Court will not consider the Amended Motion to Compel until the required notification is filed into the record. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 9/19/2017. (LLH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
