Searls v. Stroughter et al
| Gregory D. Searls, Jr. |
| M. Allen, Unknown Strahan and D. Stroughter |
| 3:2016cv00706 |
| October 19, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| John W. deGravelles |
| Erin Wilder-Doomes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
AMENDED OPINION Adopting 14 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's claims asserted against Defendant M. Strahan are dismissed for failure of Plaintiff to serve this Defendant within the delays allowed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). The 11 Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants Douglas Stroughter and Marcus Allen is granted, dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint, with prejudice, as time-barred, and that this action be dismissed. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 7/31/2018. (KAH)
|
|
Filing
15
OPINION Adopting 14 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's claims asserted against Defendant M. Strahan are dismissed for failure of Plaintiff to serve this Defendant within the delays allowed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4( m). The 11 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint, with prejudice, as time-barred, and that this action be dismissed. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 7/9/2018. (SGO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
