Odom v. Smith
| Trivenskey Odom |
| Demetrious Lollis and Juan Smith |
| 3:2016cv00748 |
| November 8, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Shelly D. Dick |
| Erin Wilder-Doomes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
RULING granting in part and denying in part 82 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff, Trivenskey Odom's claims adverse to Lieutenant Juan Smith based upon LSP ARP 2016-1841 and LSP ARP 2016-1948 are hereby dismissed with prejudice for the reasons stated herein. Defendant's Motion is denied regarding Plaintiff's claims based upon LSP ARP 2016-2295. Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 8/30/2019. (EDC)
|
|
Filing
67
RULING granting 42 Motion to Dismiss. All of Plaintiffs claims regarding events that occurred after 6/20/2016, are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 2/21/2018. (SGO)
|
|
Filing
27
NOTICE AND ORDER re: 25 MOTION to Compel Discovery Responses filed by Trivenskey Odom. Plaintiff and Defendants must confer regarding the Motion as required by Federal Rule 37(a)(1). A certification for the 25 Motion or a Motion to Withdraw the 25 Motion shall be filed by 6/23/2017. Any Opposition the 25 Motion shall be filed by 6/27/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 6/11/2017. (LLH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
