Weams v. FCA US LLC

Weams v. FCA US LLC

Plaintiff:	Curtis Ray Weams, Jr.
Defendant:	FCA US LLC
Case Number:	3:2017cv00004
Filed:	January 4, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana
Office:	Baton Rouge Office
Presiding Judge:	Shelly D. Dick
Presiding Judge:	Richard L. Bourgeois
Nature of Suit:	Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 27, 2019	Filing 89 ORDER: The 30 MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Richard Allen Hille as Untimely and Unreliable is GRANTED. The 29 MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Neil E. Hannemann is GRANTED. The 28 MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Robert J. Berriman, Jr. is GRANTED. The 31 MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Dr. William J. Vigilante, Jr. as Untimely and Unreliable is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The 33 MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Dr. Elizabeth H. Raphael, M.D. is DENIED. The 41 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED. The 40 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's claims under the LPLA based upon design defect, construction or composition, or express warranty are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 2/27/2019. (SWE)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 27, 2019

Filing 89 ORDER: The 30 MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Richard Allen Hille as Untimely and Unreliable is GRANTED. The 29 MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Neil E. Hannemann is GRANTED. The 28 MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Robert J. Berriman, Jr. is GRANTED. The 31 MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Dr. William J. Vigilante, Jr. as Untimely and Unreliable is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The 33 MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Dr. Elizabeth H. Raphael, M.D. is DENIED. The 41 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED. The 40 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's claims under the LPLA based upon design defect, construction or composition, or express warranty are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 2/27/2019. (SWE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Weams v. FCA US LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: FCA US LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Curtis Ray Weams, Jr.
Represented By:	Gary M. Gaudin
Represented By:	Loren Diane Shanklin
Represented By:	John H Smith
Represented By:	Alicia Marina Sosa
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?