Arnaud v. Vannoy et al
| Carl Arnaud |
| Jeff Landry and Darrel Vannoy |
| 3:2017cv00037 |
| February 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| James J. Brady |
| Richard L. Bourgeois |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
OPINION Adopting 27 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Petitioner's motion to amend is denied. Petitioner's application for habeas corpus relief is denied, and that this proceeding shall be dismissed. A certificate of appealability shall be denied. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 10/29/2019. (KAH)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the District Attorney for the Eighteenth Judicial District for the Parish of Iberville, State of Louisiana, shall file a supplemental response to the petition together with a memorandum of legal authorities in support of sai d response within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this Order. FURTHER, the petitioner shall have fourteen (14) days from the filing of the District Attorneys supplemental response to file a response thereto, if the petitioner wishes to do so. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 2/9/2018. (EDC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
