Raburn v. Wiener, Wiess & Madison et al
| Jonathan Raburn |
| Community Management, LLC and Wiener, Wiess & Madison |
| 3:2017cv00155 |
| March 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| John W. deGravelles |
| Richard L. Bourgeois |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
124
RULING and ORDER granting 108 Motion to Strike; striking 100 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying as moot 109 Motion to Stay; and granting in part 117 Motion for Sanctions and counsel for Community is admonished to adhere to the timeliness r equirements under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and denied in part as no monetary sanctions will be imposed. The parties will bear their own costs and fees. Oral argument scheduled for 12/16/2019 is canceled. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 12/9/2019. (EDC)
|
|
Filing
74
RULING AND ORDER granting Community's 55 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's claims against Community are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Judgment will be entered consistent with this Ruling and Order. Because final judgment will be entered in this action, former defendant Wiener, Weiss & Madison, APC's request for entry of judgment under Rule 54(b) (Doc. 51) is denied as moot. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 5/7/2018. (KAH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
