Lowery, III v. ACE American Insruance Company et al
Shelby Lowery, III |
ACE American Insruance Company, The Sherwin Williams Company and Shawn Williams |
3:2017cv00248 |
April 21, 2017 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
James J. Brady |
Richard L. Bourgeois |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 107 RULING and ORDER : Adopting 77 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Motion to Remand 99 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Brian A. Jackson on 06/21/2019. (ELW) |
Filing 97 RULING AND ORDER: The 44 Motion to Exclude is DENIED. Signed by Judge Brian A. Jackson on 3/11/2019. (KAH) |
Filing 96 RULING AND ORDER granting 45 Motion to Limit the Testimony of G. Randolph Rice. Signed by Judge Brian A. Jackson on 2/27/2019. (SWE) |
Filing 85 ORDER: An evidentiary hearing is scheduled in this matter for 1/18/2019 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6. The hearing is limited to a determination of Shawn Williams' domicile at the time of removal. By 1/16/2019, the plaintiff and the defendants shall exchange lists of witnesses and exhibits to be offered at the evidentiary hearing. Shawn Williams shall be present at the hearing and shall be prepared to provide testimony. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 1/2/2019. (KAH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.