McKarry v. Dow Chemical Company et al
| Dejuan McKarry |
| Central City and Blackhawk Railroad, Jeremy DeLacerda, Dow Chemical Company, Randy McDougal, Jr., UTLX Manufacturing, Inc., Union Carbide Corporation and Union Tank Car Company |
| 3:2017cv00556 |
| August 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Shelly D. Dick |
| Erin Wilder-Doomes |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
RULING granting 12 Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(3)8 by UCC and the remaining Defendants is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims are dismissed without prejudice. The Motion for More Definite Statement is DENIED without prejudice as moot. Any response to this Ruling shall be filed within 14 days and must be accompanied by an opposition memorandum to the original Motion. Judgment shall be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 7/19/2018. (SGO)
|
|
Filing
25
RULING Adopting 24 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. 13 Motion to Remand is DENIED, and Plaintiff's claims against Jeremy DeLacerda are DISMISSED without prejudice. It is further ordered that Plaintiff's request for fees under 28 U.S.C. Section 1447(c) is also DENIED. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 6/14/2018. (EDC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
