Russell et al v. Haghaghi et al
| Chaise Thomas and Donald Russell, Jr. |
| Hog Wild Trucking, Inc., Arch Insurance Company, Hogwild, L.L.C. and David Haghaghi |
| 3:2017cv00608 |
| September 1, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
NOTICE AND ORDER: The 8 Ex Parte MOTION to Extend Deadline to Comply with 7 Notice and Order is GRANTED IN PART. The previously set deadlines for the parties to submit memoranda and evidence regarding the amount in controversy are RESET. Defend ants shall file a memorandum and supporting evidence concerning whether the amount in controversy required of 28 U.S.C. 1332 is met on or before 10/25/2017. Plaintiffs shall file either: (1) a memorandum and supporting evidence concerning this Courts subject matter jurisdiction, specifically, whether the amount in controversy required of 28 U.S.C. 1332 is met; or (2) a Motion to Remand, within ten (10) days after the filing of Defendants' memorandum. The Scheduling Conf erence set for 11/16/2017 is CANCELLED. The Court will reset a scheduling conference and issue a new deadline for submission of the parties joint status report if subject matter jurisdiction is established. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 9/21/2017. (LLH)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
