Ancar v. LeBlanc et al
Allen Ancar |
Barrett Boeker, Butch H. Browning, Jimmy Guidry, James M. LeBlanc, Darryl Vannoy and Ray Vittorio |
3:2017cv00913 |
October 16, 2017 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
John W. deGravelles |
Richard L. Bourgeois |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 152 RULING AND ORDER granting 148 Motion for Summary Judgment and the plaintiff's claims be dismissed with prejudice, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 6/17/2021. (EDC) |
Filing 83 OPINION Adopting 81 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge.The 67 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, in part, dismissing plaintiff's claims with prejudice except the plaintiff's claim asserted against defendants Boe ker and Vittorio regarding standing water in the shower. The Court declines the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction in connection with the plaintiff's potential state law claims. This matter is referred back to Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. for further proceedings. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 4/22/2019. (SGO) |
Filing 19 ORDER granting 16 Motion to Set Aside Default. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 7/13/2018. (SGO) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.