Outley v. Bastiste et al
| Randy Outley |
| Jane Bastiste and Channle Veals |
| 3:2017cv01782 |
| December 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Shelly D. Dick |
| Erin Wilder-Doomes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
RULING AND ORDER denying 70 Motion Not to Dismiss. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(f)(3), summary judgment is granted in favor of Defendants, Jane Batiste and Channle Veals, and this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 11/18/2020. (EDC)
|
|
Filing
35
RULING Adopting 34 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction relative to Plaintiff's potential state law claims and the 21 Motion for Summary is DENIED. This matter is referred to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 09/09/2019. (NLT)
|
|
Filing
33
RULING AND ORDER granting 9 Motion for Partial Dismissal and the claims of Plaintiff, Randy Outley, for compensatory damages against defendants, Jane Batiste and Channle Veals. Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 03/13/2019. (ELW) Modified on 3/15/2019 to edit the file date (NLT).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
